Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
This project
Loading...
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
E
edx-platform
Overview
Overview
Details
Activity
Cycle Analytics
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Charts
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Board
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Charts
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Charts
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
edx
edx-platform
Commits
79c2501c
Commit
79c2501c
authored
Nov 03, 2015
by
Ben Patterson
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Plain Diff
Merge pull request #10486 from edx/benp/more-better-doc
Fix formatting.
parents
74ef9dd0
c0090358
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
3 additions
and
1 deletions
+3
-1
docs/en_us/internal/testing.rst
+3
-1
No files found.
docs/en_us/internal/testing.rst
View file @
79c2501c
...
...
@@ -472,6 +472,7 @@ The following are ways in which a developer could shorten the development
cycle for faster feedback. The options below can often be used together.
**Multiprocessing Mode**
Bok-choy tests can be threaded using the `-n` switch. Using 2 threads generally
reduces test cycles by 33%. The recommendation is to make sure the
number of threads is no more than the number of processors available. For
...
...
@@ -487,7 +488,8 @@ in multiprocessing mode, it may be worthwhile to run them in single-stream mode
to understand if you are encountering such a failure. With that noted, this
can speed development for most test classes.
**Leave Your servers Running**
**Leave Your Servers Running**
There are two additional switches available in the `paver test_bokchoy` task.
Used together, they can shorten the cycle between test runs. Similar to above,
there are a handful of tests that won't work with this approach, due to insufficient
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment