"rubric_xml" : "<rubric><category><description>Response Quality</description><score>3</score><option points='0'>Category one description.</option><option points='1'>Category two description.</option><option points='2'>Category three description.</option><option points='3'>Category four description.</option></category></rubric>",
"score" : 2,
"submission_id" : 3099,
"success" : true
},
"child_state": "post_assessment"
}
],
"graded": true,
"student_attempts": 0,
"required_peer_grading": 3,
"state": "done",
"accept_file_upload": false,
"min_to_calibrate": 3,
"max_to_calibrate": 6,
"display_name": "Open Response Assessment",
"peer_grader_count": 3,
"max_attempts": 1
}""")
# Task state with self assessment only.
TEST_STATE_SA=["{\"child_created\": false, \"child_attempts\": 1, \"version\": 1, \"child_history\": [{\"answer\": \"Censorship in the Libraries\\r<br>'All of us can think of a book that we hope none of our children or any other children have taken off the shelf. But if I have the right to remove that book from the shelf -- that work I abhor -- then you also have exactly the same right and so does everyone else. And then we have no books left on the shelf for any of us.' --Katherine Paterson, Author\\r<br><br>Write a persuasive essay to a newspaper reflecting your views on censorship in libraries. Do you believe that certain materials, such as books, music, movies, magazines, etc., should be removed from the shelves if they are found offensive? Support your position with convincing arguments from your own experience, observations, and/or reading.\", \"post_assessment\": \"[3, 3, 2, 2, 2]\", \"score\": 12}], \"max_score\": 12, \"child_state\": \"done\"}","{\"child_created\": false, \"child_attempts\": 0, \"version\": 1, \"child_history\": [{\"answer\": \"Censorship in the Libraries\\r<br>'All of us can think of a book that we hope none of our children or any other children have taken off the shelf. But if I have the right to remove that book from the shelf -- that work I abhor -- then you also have exactly the same right and so does everyone else. And then we have no books left on the shelf for any of us.' --Katherine Paterson, Author\\r<br><br>Write a persuasive essay to a newspaper reflecting your views on censorship in libraries. Do you believe that certain materials, such as books, music, movies, magazines, etc., should be removed from the shelves if they are found offensive? Support your position with convincing arguments from your own experience, observations, and/or reading.\", \"post_assessment\": \"{\\\"submission_id\\\": 1461, \\\"score\\\": 12, \\\"feedback\\\": \\\"{\\\\\\\"feedback\\\\\\\": \\\\\\\"\\\\\\\"}\\\", \\\"success\\\": true, \\\"grader_id\\\": 5414, \\\"grader_type\\\": \\\"IN\\\", \\\"rubric_scores_complete\\\": true, \\\"rubric_xml\\\": \\\"<rubric><category><description>\\\\nIdeas\\\\n</description><score>3</score><option points='0'>\\\\nDifficult for the reader to discern the main idea. Too brief or too repetitive to establish or maintain a focus.\\\\n</option><option points='1'>\\\\nAttempts a main idea. Sometimes loses focus or ineffectively displays focus.\\\\n</option><option points='2'>\\\\nPresents a unifying theme or main idea, but may include minor tangents. Stays somewhat focused on topic and task.\\\\n</option><option points='3'>\\\\nPresents a unifying theme or main idea without going off on tangents. Stays completely focused on topic and task.\\\\n</option></category><category><description>\\\\nContent\\\\n</description><score>3</score><option points='0'>\\\\nIncludes little information with few or no details or unrelated details. Unsuccessful in attempts to explore any facets of the topic.\\\\n</option><option points='1'>\\\\nIncludes little information and few or no details. Explores only one or two facets of the topic.\\\\n</option><option points='2'>\\\\nIncludes sufficient information and supporting details. (Details may not be fully developed; ideas may be listed.) Explores some facets of the topic.\\\\n</option><option points='3'>\\\\nIncludes in-depth information and exceptional supporting details that are fully developed. Explores all facets of the topic.\\\\n</option></category><category><description>\\\\nOrganization\\\\n</description><score>2</score><option points='0'>\\\\nIdeas organized illogically, transitions weak, and response difficult to follow.\\\\n</option><option points='1'>\\\\nAttempts to logically organize ideas. Attempts to progress in an order that enhances meaning, and demonstrates use of transitions.\\\\n</option><option points='2'>\\\\nIdeas organized logically. Progresses in an order that enhances meaning. Includes smooth transitions.\\\\n</option></category><category><description>\\\\nStyle\\\\n</description><score>2</score><option points='0'>\\\\nContains limited vocabulary, with many words used incorrectly. Demonstrates problems with sentence patterns.\\\\n</option><option points='1'>\\\\nContains basic vocabulary, with words that are predictable and common. Contains mostly simple sentences (although there may be an attempt at more varied sentence patterns).\\\\n</option><option points='2'>\\\\nIncludes vocabulary to make explanations detailed and precise. Includes varied sentence patterns, including complex sentences.\\\\n</option></category><category><description>\\\\nVoice\\\\n</description><score>2</score><option points='0'>\\\\nDemonstrates language and tone that may be inappropriate to task and reader.\\\\n</option><option points='1'>\\\\nDemonstrates an attempt to adjust language and tone to task and reader.\\\\n</option><option points='2'>\\\\nDemonstrates effective adjustment of language and tone to task and reader.\\\\n</option></category></rubric>\\\"}\", \"score\": 12}], \"max_score\": 12, \"child_state\": \"post_assessment\"}"]