Provide feedback in peer assessment

apps/openassessment/peer/api.py

@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ the workflow for a given submission.
 import copy
 import logging
 
+from django.utils.translation import ugettext as _
 from django.db import DatabaseError
 
 from openassessment.peer.models import Assessment
@@ -87,16 +88,15 @@ def create_assessment(
             required for the student to receive a score for their submission.
         must_be_graded_by (int): The number of assessments
             required on the submission for it to be scored.
-        assessment_dict (dict): All related information for the assessment. An
-            assessment contains points_earned, points_possible, and feedback.
+        assessment_dict (dict): All related information for the assessment.  The dictionary
+            must have the following keys: "options_selected" (mapping of criterion names to option values),
+            and "feedback" (string of written feedback for the submission).
         scored_at (datetime): Optional argument to override the time in which
             the assessment took place. If not specified, scored_at is set to
             now.
 
     Returns:
-        dict: The dictionary representing the assessment. This includes the
-            points earned, points possible, time scored, scorer id, score type,
-            and feedback.
+        dict: the Assessment model, serialized as a dict.
 
     Raises:
         PeerAssessmentRequestError: Raised when the submission_id is invalid, or
@@ -107,33 +107,33 @@ def create_assessment(
 
     Examples:
         >>> assessment_dict = dict(
-        >>>    points_earned=[1, 0, 3, 2],
-        >>>    points_possible=12,
+        >>>    options_selected={"clarity": "Very clear", "precision": "Somewhat precise"},
         >>>    feedback="Your submission was thrilling.",
         >>> )
-        >>> create_assessment("1", "Tim", assessment_dict)
-        {
-            'points_earned': 6,
-            'points_possible': 12,
-            'scored_at': datetime.datetime(2014, 1, 29, 17, 14, 52, 649284 tzinfo=<UTC>),
-            'scorer_id': u"Tim",
-            'feedback': u'Your submission was thrilling.'
-        }
-
+        >>> create_assessment("1", "Tim", 3, 2, assessment_dict, rubric_dict)
     """
     try:
         submission = Submission.objects.get(uuid=submission_uuid)
 
         rubric = rubric_from_dict(rubric_dict)
         option_ids = rubric.options_ids(assessment_dict["options_selected"])
+
+        # Validate that the selected options matched the rubric
+        # and raise an error if this is not the case
+        if None in option_ids:
+            raise PeerAssessmentRequestError(_("Selected options do not match the rubric options."))
+
+        feedback = assessment_dict.get('feedback', u'')
         peer_assessment = {
             "rubric": rubric.id,
             "scorer_id": scorer_id,
             "submission": submission.pk,
             "score_type": PEER_TYPE,
+            "feedback": feedback,
             "parts": [{"option": option_id} for option_id in option_ids]
         }
-        if scored_at:
+
+        if scored_at is not None:
             peer_assessment["scored_at"] = scored_at
 
         peer_serializer = AssessmentSerializer(data=peer_assessment)
@@ -152,23 +152,33 @@ def create_assessment(
         )
 
         # Check if the grader is finished and has enough assessments
-        scorer_item = StudentItem.objects.get(
-            student_id=scorer_id,
-            item_id=student_item.item_id,
-            course_id=student_item.course_id,
-            item_type=student_item.item_type
-        )
+        try:
+            scorer_item = StudentItem.objects.get(
+                student_id=scorer_id,
+                item_id=student_item.item_id,
+                course_id=student_item.course_id,
+                item_type=student_item.item_type
+            )
+
+        except StudentItem.DoesNotExist:
+            raise PeerAssessmentWorkflowError(_("You must make a submission before assessing another student"))
 
         scorer_submissions = Submission.objects.filter(
             student_item=scorer_item
         ).order_by("-attempt_number")
 
-        _score_if_finished(
-            scorer_item,
-            scorer_submissions[0],
-            must_grade,
-            must_be_graded_by
-        )
+        if len(scorer_submissions) > 0:
+            _score_if_finished(
+                scorer_item,
+                scorer_submissions[0],
+                must_grade,
+                must_be_graded_by
+            )
+
+        # Currently, this condition is unreachable, since the only way to create a StudentItem is to
+        # create a submission for that student.  We check anyway just in case this invariant changes.
+        else:
+            raise PeerAssessmentWorkflowError(_("You must make at least one submission before assessing another student"))
 
         return peer_serializer.data
     except DatabaseError:

apps/openassessment/peer/models.py

@@ -81,6 +81,9 @@ class Rubric(models.Model):
             options_selected (dict): Mapping of criteria names to the names of
                 the option that was selected for that criterion.
 
+        Returns:
+            list of option ids (set to None if the selected option does not match the rubric)
+
         Examples:
             >>> options_selected = {"secret": "yes", "safe": "no"}
             >>> rubric.options_ids(options_selected)
@@ -97,6 +100,8 @@ class Rubric(models.Model):
 
         return [
             crit_to_all_opts[crit][opt]
+            if crit in crit_to_all_opts and opt in crit_to_all_opts[crit]
+            else None
             for crit, opt in options_selected.items()
         ]
 
@@ -186,7 +191,6 @@ class Assessment(models.Model):
     scorer_id = models.CharField(max_length=40, db_index=True)
     score_type = models.CharField(max_length=2)
 
-    # TODO: move this to its own model
     feedback = models.TextField(max_length=10000, default="")
 
     class Meta:

apps/openassessment/peer/serializers.py

@@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ class AssessmentSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
             'scored_at',
             'scorer_id',
             'score_type',
+            'feedback', 
 
             # Foreign Key
             'parts',

apps/openassessment/peer/test/test_api.py

@@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ class TestApi(TestCase):
         )
         self.assertEqual(assessment["points_earned"], 6)
         self.assertEqual(assessment["points_possible"], 14)
+        self.assertEqual(assessment["feedback"], ASSESSMENT_DICT["feedback"])
 
     @file_data('valid_assessments.json')
     def test_get_assessments(self, assessment_dict):
@@ -288,6 +289,22 @@ class TestApi(TestCase):
         self.assertEqual(16, Assessment.get_median_score([5, 6, 12, 16, 22, 53, 102]))
         self.assertEqual(16, Assessment.get_median_score([16, 6, 12, 102, 22, 53, 5]))
 
+    @raises(peer_api.PeerAssessmentWorkflowError)
+    def test_assess_before_submitting(self):
+        # Create a submission for another student
+        submission = sub_api.create_submission(STUDENT_ITEM, ANSWER_ONE)
+
+        # Attempt to create the assessment from another student without first making a submission
+        peer_api.create_assessment(
+            submission["uuid"],
+            "another_student",
+            REQUIRED_GRADED,
+            REQUIRED_GRADED_BY,
+            ASSESSMENT_DICT,
+            RUBRIC_DICT,
+            MONDAY
+        )
+
     @staticmethod
     def _create_student_and_submission(student, answer, date=None):
         new_student_item = STUDENT_ITEM.copy()

apps/openassessment/templates/openassessmentblock/grade/oa_grade_complete.html

@@ -6,6 +6,16 @@
         <span class="grade__value">{{ score.points_earned }}</span> out of <span class="grade__potential">{{ score.points_possible }}</span>
     </div>
 
+    <!-- PLACEHOLDER: @talbs, you can overwrite this with the actual template -->
+    <div class="openassessment__feedback">
+        {% for asmnt in assessments %}
+        <div class="openassessment__peer_assessment_{{ forloop.counter }}">
+            <div>Peer #{{ forloop.counter }}</div>
+            <div>Feedback: {{ asmnt.feedback }}</div>
+        </div>
+        {% endfor %}
+    </div>
+
     <div class="grade__actions">
         <ul class="list list--actions">
             <li class="list--actions__item">
@@ -13,4 +23,4 @@
             </li>
         </ul>
     </div>
-</div>
+</div>
\ No newline at end of file

apps/openassessment/xblock/grade_mixin.py

 from xblock.core import XBlock
+from openassessment.peer.api import get_assessments
 from submissions.api import get_score
 
 
@@ -23,7 +24,14 @@ class GradeMixin(object):
             student_item = self.get_student_item_dict()
             scores = get_score(student_item)
             if scores:
-                context = {"score": scores[0]}
+                context = {
+                    "score": scores[0],
+                    "assessments": [],
+                }
+
+                # Look up assessment feedback
+                for assessment in get_assessments(scores[0]['submission_uuid']):
+                    context['assessments'].append(assessment)
             else:
                 path = 'openassessmentblock/grade/oa_grade_waiting.html'
         elif not problem_open and date == "due":
@@ -33,4 +41,3 @@ class GradeMixin(object):
             # TODO: How do we determine which modules are incomplete?
 
         return self.render_assessment(path, context)
-

apps/openassessment/xblock/peer_assessment_mixin.py

+import logging
+from django.utils.translation import ugettext as _
 from xblock.core import XBlock
 from openassessment.peer import api as peer_api
-from openassessment.peer.api import PeerAssessmentWorkflowError
+from openassessment.peer.api import (
+        PeerAssessmentWorkflowError, PeerAssessmentRequestError,
+        PeerAssessmentInternalError
+)
+
+
+logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
 
 
 class PeerAssessmentMixin(object):
@@ -25,37 +33,59 @@ class PeerAssessmentMixin(object):
 
         Args:
             data (dict): A dictionary containing information required to create
-                a new peer assessment. Expecting attributes "points_earned",
-                "total_value", and "submission_uuid". If these attributes are
-                 not available, a new assessment cannot be stored.
+                a new peer assessment.  This dict should have the following attributes:
+                `submission_uuid` (string): The unique identifier for the submission being assessed.
+                `options_selected` (dict): Dictionary mapping criterion names to option values.
+                `feedback` (unicode): Written feedback for the submission.
 
         Returns:
-            (tuple): A tuple containing the dictionary representation of the
-            newly created assessment, and a "Success" string.
+            Dict with keys "success" (bool) indicating success/failure.
+            and "msg" (unicode) containing additional information if an error occurs.
 
         """
+        # Validate the request
+        if 'feedback' not in data:
+            return {'success': False, 'msg': _('Must provide feedback in the assessment')}
+
+        if 'options_selected' not in data:
+            return {'success': False, 'msg': _('Must provide options selected in the assessment')}
+
+        if 'submission_uuid' not in data:
+            return {'success': False, 'msg': _('Must provide submission uuid for the assessment')}
+
         assessment_ui_model = self.get_assessment_module('peer-assessment')
         if assessment_ui_model:
             rubric_dict = {
                 'criteria': self.rubric_criteria
             }
             assessment_dict = {
-                "feedback": "Not yet implemented.",
+                "feedback": data['feedback'],
                 "options_selected": data["options_selected"],
             }
-            assessment = peer_api.create_assessment(
-                data["submission_uuid"],
-                self.get_student_item_dict()["student_id"],
-                int(assessment_ui_model["must_grade"]),
-                int(assessment_ui_model["must_be_graded_by"]),
-                assessment_dict,
-                rubric_dict,
-            )
+
+            try:
+                assessment = peer_api.create_assessment(
+                    data["submission_uuid"],
+                    self.get_student_item_dict()["student_id"],
+                    int(assessment_ui_model["must_grade"]),
+                    int(assessment_ui_model["must_be_graded_by"]),
+                    assessment_dict,
+                    rubric_dict,
+                )
+            except PeerAssessmentRequestError as ex:
+                return {'success': False, 'msg': ex.message}
+            except PeerAssessmentInternalError as ex:
+                logger.exception()
+                return {'success': False, 'msg': _("Internal error occurred while creating the assessment")}
 
             # Temp kludge until we fix JSON serialization for datetime
             assessment["scored_at"] = str(assessment["scored_at"])
 
-        return {}
+            return {'success': True, 'msg': u''}
+
+        else:
+            return {'success': False, 'msg': _('Could not load peer assessment.')}
+
 
 
     @XBlock.handler

apps/openassessment/xblock/static/js/spec/oa_edit.js

-/*
+/**
 Tests for OA XBlock editing.
-*/
+**/
 
 describe("OpenAssessment.StudioUI", function() {
 

apps/openassessment/xblock/static/js/spec/oa_server.js

@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ describe("OpenAssessment.Server", function() {
         });
     });
 
-    it("Sends a submission the XBlock", function() {
+    it("Sends a submission to the XBlock", function() {
         // Status, student ID, attempt number
         stubAjax(true, [true, 1, 2]);
 
@@ -69,7 +69,28 @@ describe("OpenAssessment.Server", function() {
         expect($.ajax).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
             url: '/submit',
             type: "POST",
-            data: {submission: "This is only a test"}
+            data: JSON.stringify({submission: "This is only a test"})
+        });
+    });
+
+    it("Sends an assessment to the XBlock", function() {
+        stubAjax(true, {success: true, msg:''});
+
+        var success = false;
+        var options = {clarity: "Very clear", precision: "Somewhat precise"}
+        server.assess("abc1234", options, "Excellent job!").done(function() {
+            success = true;
+        });
+
+        expect(success).toBe(true);
+        expect($.ajax).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
+            url: '/assess',
+            type: "POST",
+            data: JSON.stringify({
+                submission_uuid: "abc1234",
+                options_selected: options,
+                feedback: "Excellent job!"
+            })
         });
     });
 
@@ -183,4 +204,28 @@ describe("OpenAssessment.Server", function() {
 
         expect(receivedMsg).toEqual("Test error");
     });
+
+    it("informs the caller of a server error when sending an  assessment", function() {
+        stubAjax(true, {success:false, msg:'Test error!'});
+
+        var receivedMsg = null;
+        var options = {clarity: "Very clear", precision: "Somewhat precise"}
+        server.assess("abc1234", options, "Excellent job!").fail(function(msg) {
+            receivedMsg = msg;
+        });
+
+        expect(receivedMsg).toEqual("Test error!");
+    });
+
+    it("informs the caller of an AJAX error when sending an  assessment", function() {
+        stubAjax(false, null);
+
+        var receivedMsg = null;
+        var options = {clarity: "Very clear", precision: "Somewhat precise"}
+        server.assess("abc1234", options, "Excellent job!").fail(function(msg) {
+            receivedMsg = msg;
+        });
+
+        expect(receivedMsg).toEqual("Could not contact server.");
+    });
 });

apps/openassessment/xblock/static/js/src/oa_server.js

@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ OpenAssessment.Server.prototype = {
             $.ajax({
                 type: "POST",
                 url: url,
-                data: {submission: submission}
+                data: JSON.stringify({submission: submission})
             }).done(function(data) {
                 var success = data[0];
                 if (success) {
@@ -105,6 +105,51 @@ OpenAssessment.Server.prototype = {
     },
 
     /**
+    Send an assessment to the XBlock.
+
+    Args:
+        submissionId (string): The UUID of the submission.
+        optionsSelected (object literal): Keys are criteria names,
+            values are the option text the user selected for the criterion.
+        feedback (string): Written feedback on the submission.
+
+    Returns:
+        A JQuery promise, which resolves with no args if successful
+        and fails with an error message otherise.
+
+    Example:
+        var options = { clarity: "Very clear", precision: "Somewhat precise" };
+        var feedback = "Good job!";
+        server.assess("abc123", options, feedback).done(
+            function() { console.log("Success!"); }
+        ).fail(
+            function(errorMsg) { console.log(errorMsg); }
+        );
+    **/
+    assess: function(submissionId, optionsSelected, feedback) {
+        var url = this.url('assess');
+        var payload = JSON.stringify({
+            submission_uuid: submissionId,
+            options_selected: optionsSelected,
+            feedback: feedback
+        });
+        return $.Deferred(function(defer) {
+            $.ajax({ type: "POST", url: url, data: payload }).done(
+                function(data) {
+                    if (data.success) {
+                        defer.resolve();
+                    }
+                    else {
+                        defer.rejectWith(this, [data.msg]);
+                    }
+                }
+            ).fail(function(data) {
+                defer.rejectWith(this, ['Could not contact server.']);
+            });
+        }).promise()
+    },
+
+    /**
     Load the XBlock's XML definition from the server.
 
     Returns:

apps/openassessment/xblock/static/xml/censorship_rubric_example.xml

@@ -60,11 +60,6 @@
             </criterion>
         </rubric>
         <assessments>
-            <assessment name="self-assessment"
-                        start="2014-12-20T19:00-7:00"
-                        due="2014-12-21T22:22-7:00"
-                        must_grade="5"
-                        must_be_graded_by="3" />
             <assessment name="peer-assessment"
                         start="2014-12-20T19:00-7:00"
                         due="2014-12-21T22:22-7:00"

apps/openassessment/xblock/test/data/assessment_scenario.xml

+<openassessment>
+    <title>Open Assessment Test</title>
+    <prompt>
+        Given the state of the world today, what do you think should be done to
+        combat poverty? Please answer in a short essay of 200-300 words.
+    </prompt>
+    <rubric>
+        <prompt>Read for conciseness, clarity of thought, and form.</prompt>
+        <criterion>
+            <name>𝓒𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓮</name>
+            <prompt>How concise is it?</prompt>
+            <option points="3">
+                <name>ﻉซƈﻉɭɭﻉกՇ</name>
+                <explanation>Extremely concise</explanation>
+            </option>
+            <option points="2">
+                <name>Ġööḋ</name>
+                <explanation>Concise</explanation>
+            </option>
+            <option points="1">
+                <name>ק๏๏г</name>
+                <explanation>Wordy</explanation>
+            </option>
+        </criterion>
+        <criterion>
+            <name>Form</name>
+            <prompt>How well-formed is it?</prompt>
+            <option points="3">
+                <name>Good</name>
+                <explanation>Good</explanation>
+            </option>
+            <option points="2">
+                <name>Fair</name>
+                <explanation>Fair</explanation>
+            </option>
+            <option points="1">
+                <name>Poor</name>
+                <explanation>Poor</explanation>
+            </option>
+        </criterion>
+    </rubric>
+    <assessments>
+        <assessment name="peer-assessment"
+          start="2014-12-20T19:00"
+          due="2014-12-21T22:22"
+          must_grade="5"
+          must_be_graded_by="3" />
+    </assessments>
+</openassessment>

apps/openassessment/xblock/test/data/basic_scenario.xml

@@ -84,11 +84,10 @@
         </criterion>
     </rubric>
     <assessments>
-        <peer-assessment name="peer-assessment"
+        <assessment name="peer-assessment"
           start="2014-12-20T19:00"
           due="2014-12-21T22:22"
           must_grade="5"
           must_be_graded_by="3" />
-        <self-assessment name="self-assessment"/>
     </assessments>
 </openassessment>

apps/openassessment/xblock/test/data/grade_scenario.xml

+<openassessment>
+    <title>Open Assessment Test</title>
+    <prompt>
+        Given the state of the world today, what do you think should be done to
+        combat poverty? Please answer in a short essay of 200-300 words.
+    </prompt>
+    <rubric>
+        <prompt>Read for conciseness, clarity of thought, and form.</prompt>
+        <criterion>
+            <name>𝓒𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓮</name>
+            <prompt>How concise is it?</prompt>
+            <option points="3">
+                <name>ﻉซƈﻉɭɭﻉกՇ</name>
+                <explanation>Extremely concise</explanation>
+            </option>
+            <option points="2">
+                <name>Ġööḋ</name>
+                <explanation>Concise</explanation>
+            </option>
+            <option points="1">
+                <name>ק๏๏г</name>
+                <explanation>Wordy</explanation>
+            </option>
+        </criterion>
+        <criterion>
+            <name>Form</name>
+            <prompt>How well-formed is it?</prompt>
+            <option points="3">
+                <name>Good</name>
+                <explanation>Good</explanation>
+            </option>
+            <option points="2">
+                <name>Fair</name>
+                <explanation>Fair</explanation>
+            </option>
+            <option points="1">
+                <name>Poor</name>
+                <explanation>Poor</explanation>
+            </option>
+        </criterion>
+    </rubric>
+    <assessments>
+        <assessment name="peer-assessment"
+          start="2014-12-20T19:00"
+          due="2014-12-21T22:22"
+          must_grade="2"
+          must_be_graded_by="2" />
+    </assessments>
+</openassessment>

apps/openassessment/xblock/test/test_grade.py

+# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
+"""
+Tests for grade handlers in Open Assessment XBlock.
+"""
+import copy
+import json
+from submissions import api as submission_api
+from openassessment.peer import api as peer_api
+from .base import XBlockHandlerTestCase, scenario
+
+
+class TestGrade(XBlockHandlerTestCase):
+
+    ASSESSMENTS = [
+        {
+            'options_selected': {u'𝓒𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓮': u'ﻉซƈﻉɭɭﻉกՇ', u'Form': u'Fair'},
+            'feedback': u'єאςєɭɭєภՇ ฬ๏гк!',
+        },
+        {
+            'options_selected': {u'𝓒𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓮': u'ﻉซƈﻉɭɭﻉกՇ', u'Form': u'Fair'},
+            'feedback': u'Good job!',
+        },
+    ]
+
+    SUBMISSION = u'ՇﻉรՇ รપ๒๓ٱรรٱѻก'
+
+    @scenario('data/grade_scenario.xml', user_id='Greggs')
+    def test_render_grade(self, xblock):
+
+        # Create a submission from the user
+        student_item = xblock.get_student_item_dict()
+        submission = submission_api.create_submission(student_item, self.SUBMISSION)
+
+        scorer_submissions = []
+        for scorer_name, assessment in zip(['McNulty', 'Freamon'], self.ASSESSMENTS):
+            # Create a submission for each scorer
+            scorer = copy.deepcopy(student_item)
+            scorer['student_id'] = scorer_name
+            scorer_sub = submission_api.create_submission(scorer, self.SUBMISSION)
+
+            # Store the scorer's submission so our user can assess it later
+            scorer_submissions.append(scorer_sub)
+
+            # Create an assessment of the user's submission
+            peer_api.create_assessment(
+                submission['uuid'], scorer_name, 2, 2,
+                assessment, {'criteria': xblock.rubric_criteria}
+            )
+
+        # Have our user make assessments (so she can get a score)
+        for submission in scorer_submissions:
+            peer_api.create_assessment(
+                submission['uuid'], 'Greggs', 2, 2,
+                self.ASSESSMENTS[0], {'criteria': xblock.rubric_criteria}
+            )
+
+        # Render the view
+        resp = self.request(xblock, 'render_grade', json.dumps(dict()))
+
+        # Verify that feedback from each scorer appears in the view
+        self.assertIn(u'єאςєɭɭєภՇ ฬ๏гк!', resp.decode('utf-8'))
+        self.assertIn(u'Good job!', resp.decode('utf-8'))

apps/openassessment/xblock/test/test_peer.py

+# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
+"""
+Tests for peer assessment handlers in Open Assessment XBlock.
+"""
+
+import copy
+import json
+from submissions import api as submission_api
+from openassessment.peer import api as peer_api
+from .base import XBlockHandlerTestCase, scenario
+
+
+class TestPeerAssessment(XBlockHandlerTestCase):
+
+    ASSESSMENT = {
+        'submission_uuid': None,
+        'options_selected': {u'𝓒𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓮': u'ﻉซƈﻉɭɭﻉกՇ', u'Form': u'Fair'},
+        'feedback': u'єאςєɭɭєภՇ ฬ๏гк!',
+    }
+
+    SUBMISSION = u'ՇﻉรՇ รપ๒๓ٱรรٱѻก'
+
+    @scenario('data/assessment_scenario.xml', user_id='Bob')
+    def test_assess_handler(self, xblock):
+
+        # Create a submission for this problem from another user
+        student_item = xblock.get_student_item_dict()
+        student_item['student_id'] = 'Sally'
+        submission = submission_api.create_submission(student_item, self.SUBMISSION)
+
+        # Create a submission for the scorer (required before assessing another student)
+        another_student = copy.deepcopy(student_item)
+        another_student['student_id'] = "Bob"
+        submission_api.create_submission(another_student, self.SUBMISSION)
+
+        # Submit an assessment and expect a successful response
+        assessment = copy.deepcopy(self.ASSESSMENT)
+        assessment['submission_uuid'] = submission['uuid']
+        resp = self.request(xblock, 'assess', json.dumps(assessment), response_format='json')
+        self.assertTrue(resp['success'])
+
+        # Retrieve the assessment and check that it matches what we sent
+        actual = peer_api.get_assessments(submission['uuid'])
+        self.assertEqual(len(actual), 1)
+        self.assertEqual(actual[0]['submission_uuid'], assessment['submission_uuid'])
+        self.assertEqual(actual[0]['points_earned'], 5)
+        self.assertEqual(actual[0]['points_possible'], 6)
+        self.assertEqual(actual[0]['scorer_id'], 'Bob')
+        self.assertEqual(actual[0]['score_type'], 'PE')
+
+        self.assertEqual(len(actual[0]['parts']), 2)
+        parts = sorted(actual[0]['parts'])
+        self.assertEqual(parts[0]['option']['criterion']['name'], u'Form')
+        self.assertEqual(parts[0]['option']['name'], 'Fair')
+        self.assertEqual(parts[1]['option']['criterion']['name'], u'𝓒𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓮')
+        self.assertEqual(parts[1]['option']['name'], u'ﻉซƈﻉɭɭﻉกՇ')
+
+        self.assertEqual(actual[0]['feedback'], assessment['feedback'])
+
+    @scenario('data/assessment_scenario.xml', user_id='Bob')
+    def test_assess_rubric_option_mismatch(self, xblock):
+
+        # Create a submission for this problem from another user
+        student_item = xblock.get_student_item_dict()
+        student_item['student_id'] = 'Sally'
+        submission = submission_api.create_submission(student_item, self.SUBMISSION)
+
+        # Create a submission for the scorer (required before assessing another student)
+        another_student = copy.deepcopy(student_item)
+        another_student['student_id'] = "Bob"
+        submission_api.create_submission(another_student, self.SUBMISSION)
+
+        # Submit an assessment, but mutate the options selected so they do NOT match the rubric
+        assessment = copy.deepcopy(self.ASSESSMENT)
+        assessment['submission_uuid'] = submission['uuid']
+        assessment['options_selected']['invalid'] = 'not a part of the rubric!'
+        resp = self.request(xblock, 'assess', json.dumps(assessment), response_format='json')
+
+        # Expect an error response
+        self.assertFalse(resp['success'])
+
+
+    @scenario('data/assessment_scenario.xml', user_id='Bob')
+    def test_missing_keys_in_request(self, xblock):
+        for missing in ['feedback', 'submission_uuid', 'options_selected']:
+            assessment = copy.deepcopy(self.ASSESSMENT)
+            del assessment[missing]
+            resp = self.request(xblock, 'assess', json.dumps(assessment), response_format='json')
+            self.assertEqual(resp['success'], False)

apps/submissions/models.py

@@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ class Score(models.Model):
     points_possible = models.PositiveIntegerField(default=0)
     created_at = models.DateTimeField(editable=False, default=now, db_index=True)
 
+    @property
+    def submission_uuid(self):
+        return self.submission.uuid
+
     def __repr__(self):
         return repr(dict(
             student_item=self.student_item,

apps/submissions/serializers.py

@@ -26,6 +26,18 @@ class SubmissionSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
 
 
 class ScoreSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
+
+    submission_uuid = serializers.Field(source='submission_uuid')
+
     class Meta:
         model = Score
-        fields = ('student_item', 'submission', 'points_earned', 'points_possible', 'created_at')
+        fields = (
+            'student_item',
+            'submission',
+            'points_earned',
+            'points_possible',
+            'created_at',
+
+            # Computed
+            'submission_uuid',
+        )

apps/submissions/tests/test_api.py

@@ -131,9 +131,11 @@ class TestApi(TestCase):
         self._assert_score(score, 11, 12)
 
     def test_get_score(self):
-        self.test_create_score()
+        submission = api.create_submission(STUDENT_ITEM, ANSWER_ONE)
+        api.set_score(STUDENT_ITEM, submission, 11, 12)
         scores = api.get_score(STUDENT_ITEM)
         self._assert_score(scores[0], 11, 12)
+        self.assertEqual(scores[0]['submission_uuid'], submission['uuid'])
 
     def test_get_score_no_student_id(self):
         student_item = copy.deepcopy(STUDENT_ITEM)