@@ -774,6 +774,8 @@ To support multiple updates you'll need to do so explicitly. When writing your m
...
@@ -774,6 +774,8 @@ To support multiple updates you'll need to do so explicitly. When writing your m
* How should insertions be handled? Are they invalid, or do they create new objects?
* How should insertions be handled? Are they invalid, or do they create new objects?
* How should removals be handled? Do they imply object deletion, or removing a relationship? Should they be silently ignored, or are they invalid?
* How should removals be handled? Do they imply object deletion, or removing a relationship? Should they be silently ignored, or are they invalid?
* How should ordering be handled? Does changing the position of two items imply any state change or is it ignored?
* How should ordering be handled? Does changing the position of two items imply any state change or is it ignored?
You will need to add an explicit `id` field to the instance serializer. The default implicitly-generated `id` field is marked as `read_only`. This causes it to be removed on updates. Once you declare it explicitly, it will be available in the list serializer's `update` method.
Here's an example of how you might choose to implement multiple updates:
Here's an example of how you might choose to implement multiple updates:
...
@@ -805,6 +807,8 @@ Here's an example of how you might choose to implement multiple updates:
...
@@ -805,6 +807,8 @@ Here's an example of how you might choose to implement multiple updates: