Commit 51d86a65 by Tom Christie

Support dotted source on relational fields

parent 3e878a32
......@@ -56,8 +56,8 @@ class RelatedField(Field):
queryset = queryset.all()
return queryset
def get_iterable(self, instance, source):
relationship = get_attribute(instance, [source])
def get_iterable(self, instance, source_attrs):
relationship = get_attribute(instance, source_attrs)
return relationship.all() if (hasattr(relationship, 'all')) else relationship
@property
......@@ -106,11 +106,12 @@ class PrimaryKeyRelatedField(RelatedField):
# the related object. We return this directly instead of returning the
# object itself, which would require a database lookup.
try:
return PKOnlyObject(pk=instance.serializable_value(self.source))
instance = get_attribute(instance, self.source_attrs[:-1])
return PKOnlyObject(pk=instance.serializable_value(self.source_attrs[-1]))
except AttributeError:
return get_attribute(instance, [self.source])
return get_attribute(instance, self.source_attrs)
def get_iterable(self, instance, source):
def get_iterable(self, instance, source_attrs):
# For consistency with `get_attribute` we're using `serializable_value()`
# here. Typically there won't be any difference, but some custom field
# types might return a non-primative value for the pk otherwise.
......@@ -119,7 +120,7 @@ class PrimaryKeyRelatedField(RelatedField):
# would be better in some case, but would actually end up with *more*
# queries if the developer is using `prefetch_related` across the
# relationship.
relationship = super(PrimaryKeyRelatedField, self).get_iterable(instance, source)
relationship = super(PrimaryKeyRelatedField, self).get_iterable(instance, source_attrs)
return [
PKOnlyObject(pk=item.serializable_value('pk'))
for item in relationship
......@@ -318,7 +319,7 @@ class ManyRelation(Field):
]
def get_attribute(self, instance):
return self.child_relation.get_iterable(instance, self.source)
return self.child_relation.get_iterable(instance, self.source_attrs)
def to_representation(self, iterable):
return [
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment