Skip to content

E
edx-ora2
Commit 93544bbd by David Ormsbee
Options

Merge pull request #82 from edx/ormsbee/no_verticals 

Remove verticals from our scenarios -- don't need them.
parents 7d1197a7 6aa28e1e
Showing with 183 additions and 191 deletions
apps/openassessment/xblock/static/xml/censorship_rubric_example.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<vertical_demo>
<openassessment start="2013-02-24T13:53:50" due="2040-02-24T13:53:50">
<title>
Censorship in Public Libraries
</title>
<rubric>
<prompt>
What do you think about censorship in libraries? I think it's pretty great.
Read for conciseness, clarity of thought, and form.
</prompt>
<criterion>
<name>concise</name>
<prompt>How concise is it?</prompt>
<option points="0">
<name>The Bible</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="1">
<name>Earnest Hemingway</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="3">
<name>Matsuo Basho</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
</criterion>
<criterion>
<name>clear-headed</name>
<prompt>How clear is the thinking?</prompt>
<option points="0">
<name>Eric</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="1">
<name>John</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="2">
<name>Ian</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
</criterion>
<criterion>
<name>form</name>
<prompt>Lastly, how is it's form? Punctuation, grammar, and spelling all count.</prompt>
<option points="0">
<name>IRC</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="1">
<name>Real Email</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="2">
<name>Old-timey letters</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
</criterion>
</rubric>
<assessments>
<assessment name="peer-assessment"
start="2014-12-20T19:00-7:00"
due="2014-12-21T22:22-7:00"
must_grade="5"
must_be_graded_by="3" />
</assessments>
</openassessment>
</vertical_demo>
<openassessment start="2013-02-24T13:53:50" due="2040-02-24T13:53:50">
<title>
Censorship in Public Libraries
</title>
<rubric>
<prompt>
What do you think about censorship in libraries? I think it's pretty great.
Read for conciseness, clarity of thought, and form.
</prompt>
<criterion>
<name>concise</name>
<prompt>How concise is it?</prompt>
<option points="0">
<name>The Bible</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="1">
<name>Earnest Hemingway</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="3">
<name>Matsuo Basho</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
</criterion>
<criterion>
<name>clear-headed</name>
<prompt>How clear is the thinking?</prompt>
<option points="0">
<name>Eric</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="1">
<name>John</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="2">
<name>Ian</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
</criterion>
<criterion>
<name>form</name>
<prompt>Lastly, how is it's form? Punctuation, grammar, and spelling all count.</prompt>
<option points="0">
<name>IRC</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="1">
<name>Real Email</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="2">
<name>Old-timey letters</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
</criterion>
</rubric>
<assessments>
<assessment name="peer-assessment"
start="2014-12-20T19:00-7:00"
due="2014-12-21T22:22-7:00"
must_grade="5"
must_be_graded_by="3" />
</assessments>
</openassessment>
apps/openassessment/xblock/static/xml/poverty_rubric_example.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<vertical_demo>
<openassessment start="2013-02-24T13:53:50" due="2040-02-24T13:53:50">
<title>
Global Poverty
</title>
<rubric>
<prompt>
Given the state of the world today, what do you think should be done to
combat poverty?
Read for conciseness, clarity of thought, and form.
</prompt>
<criterion>
<name>concise</name>
<prompt>How concise is it?</prompt>
<option points="0">
<name>Neal Stephenson (late)</name>
<explanation>
In "Cryptonomicon", Stephenson spent multiple pages talking about breakfast cereal.
While hilarious, in recent years his work has been anything but 'concise'.
</explanation>
</option>
<option points="1">
<name>HP Lovecraft</name>
<explanation>
If the author wrote something cyclopean that staggers the mind, score it thus.
</explanation>
</option>
<option points="3">
<name>Robert Heinlein</name>
<explanation>
Tight prose that conveys a wealth of information about the world in relatively
few words. Example, "The door irised open and he stepped inside."
</explanation>
</option>
<option points="4">
<name>Neal Stephenson (early)</name>
<explanation>
When Stephenson still had an editor, his prose was dense, with anecdotes about
nitrox abuse implying main characters' whole life stories.
</explanation>
</option>
<option points="5">
<name>Earnest Hemingway</name>
<explanation>
Score the work this way if it makes you weep, and the removal of a single
word would make you sneer.
</explanation>
</option>
</criterion>
<criterion>
<name>clear-headed</name>
<prompt>How clear is the thinking?</prompt>
<option points="0">
<name>Yogi Berra</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="1">
<name>Hunter S. Thompson</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="2">
<name>Robert Heinlein</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="3">
<name>Isaac Asimov</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="10">
<name>Spock</name>
<explanation>
Coolly rational, with a firm grasp of the main topics, a crystal-clear train of thought,
and unemotional examination of the facts. This is the only item explained in this category,
to show that explained and unexplained items can be mixed.
</explanation>
</option>
</criterion>
<criterion>
<name>form</name>
<prompt>Lastly, how is it's form? Punctuation, grammar, and spelling all count.</prompt>
<option points="0">
<name>lolcats</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="1">
<name>Facebook</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="2">
<name>Reddit</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="3">
<name>metafilter</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="4">
<name>Usenet, 1996</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="5">
<name>The Elements of Style</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
</criterion>
</rubric>
<assessments>
<assessment start="2014-12-20T19:00-7:00"
name="peer-assessment"
due="2014-12-21T22:22-7:00"
must_grade="5"
must_be_graded_by="3" />
<assessment name="self-assessment"
due="2014-12-21T22:22-7:00"
must_grade="5"
must_be_graded_by="3" />
</assessments>
</openassessment>
</vertical_demo>
<openassessment start="2013-02-24T13:53:50" due="2040-02-24T13:53:50">
<title>
Global Poverty
</title>
<rubric>
<prompt>
Given the state of the world today, what do you think should be done to
combat poverty?
Read for conciseness, clarity of thought, and form.
</prompt>
<criterion>
<name>concise</name>
<prompt>How concise is it?</prompt>
<option points="0">
<name>Neal Stephenson (late)</name>
<explanation>
In "Cryptonomicon", Stephenson spent multiple pages talking about breakfast cereal.
While hilarious, in recent years his work has been anything but 'concise'.
</explanation>
</option>
<option points="1">
<name>HP Lovecraft</name>
<explanation>
If the author wrote something cyclopean that staggers the mind, score it thus.
</explanation>
</option>
<option points="3">
<name>Robert Heinlein</name>
<explanation>
Tight prose that conveys a wealth of information about the world in relatively
few words. Example, "The door irised open and he stepped inside."
</explanation>
</option>
<option points="4">
<name>Neal Stephenson (early)</name>
<explanation>
When Stephenson still had an editor, his prose was dense, with anecdotes about
nitrox abuse implying main characters' whole life stories.
</explanation>
</option>
<option points="5">
<name>Earnest Hemingway</name>
<explanation>
Score the work this way if it makes you weep, and the removal of a single
word would make you sneer.
</explanation>
</option>
</criterion>
<criterion>
<name>clear-headed</name>
<prompt>How clear is the thinking?</prompt>
<option points="0">
<name>Yogi Berra</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="1">
<name>Hunter S. Thompson</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="2">
<name>Robert Heinlein</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="3">
<name>Isaac Asimov</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="10">
<name>Spock</name>
<explanation>
Coolly rational, with a firm grasp of the main topics, a crystal-clear train of thought,
and unemotional examination of the facts. This is the only item explained in this category,
to show that explained and unexplained items can be mixed.
</explanation>
</option>
</criterion>
<criterion>
<name>form</name>
<prompt>Lastly, how is it's form? Punctuation, grammar, and spelling all count.</prompt>
<option points="0">
<name>lolcats</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="1">
<name>Facebook</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="2">
<name>Reddit</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="3">
<name>metafilter</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="4">
<name>Usenet, 1996</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
<option points="5">
<name>The Elements of Style</name>
<explanation></explanation>
</option>
</criterion>
</rubric>
<assessments>
<assessment start="2014-12-20T19:00-7:00"
name="peer-assessment"
due="2014-12-21T22:22-7:00"
must_grade="5"
must_be_graded_by="3" />
<assessment name="self-assessment"
due="2014-12-21T22:22-7:00"
must_grade="5"
must_be_graded_by="3" />
</assessments>
</openassessment>
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment