Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
This project
Loading...
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
D
django-rest-framework
Overview
Overview
Details
Activity
Cycle Analytics
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Charts
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Board
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Charts
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Charts
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
edx
django-rest-framework
Commits
25bd6d1d
Commit
25bd6d1d
authored
Dec 23, 2013
by
S. Andrew Sheppard
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
can't save genericrelations via nested serializers in django 1.6
parent
75e87247
Show whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
29 additions
and
0 deletions
+29
-0
rest_framework/tests/test_genericrelations.py
+29
-0
No files found.
rest_framework/tests/test_genericrelations.py
View file @
25bd6d1d
...
...
@@ -69,6 +69,35 @@ class TestGenericRelations(TestCase):
}
self
.
assertEqual
(
serializer
.
data
,
expected
)
def
test_generic_nested_relation
(
self
):
"""
Test saving a GenericRelation field via a nested serializer.
"""
class
TagSerializer
(
serializers
.
ModelSerializer
):
class
Meta
:
model
=
Tag
exclude
=
(
'content_type'
,
'object_id'
)
class
BookmarkSerializer
(
serializers
.
ModelSerializer
):
tags
=
TagSerializer
()
class
Meta
:
model
=
Bookmark
exclude
=
(
'id'
,)
data
=
{
'url'
:
'https://docs.djangoproject.com/'
,
'tags'
:
[
{
'tag'
:
'contenttypes'
},
{
'tag'
:
'genericrelations'
},
]
}
serializer
=
BookmarkSerializer
(
data
=
data
)
self
.
assertTrue
(
serializer
.
is_valid
())
serializer
.
save
()
self
.
assertEqual
(
serializer
.
object
.
tags
.
count
(),
2
)
def
test_generic_fk
(
self
):
"""
Test a relationship that spans a GenericForeignKey field.
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment